|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 14, 2020 12:52:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jan 14, 2020 13:16:03 GMT
Interesting decision, which I would agree seems a bit excessive.
What’s also interesting is that the suspension isn’t for their next game (against Lions) but the one after (against Raiders). Why’s that?
|
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 14, 2020 13:19:47 GMT
Apparently FIBA rules say that suspensions take place 7 days after the offence - so not Lions but Raiders.
|
|
|
|
Post by notoriousbigz on Jan 14, 2020 13:51:31 GMT
Seems just a touch harsh that.
And by harsh I mean completely ridiculous. Guys naturally gravitate to a situation like that to break it up. Even if they didnt it wasnt like it was a mass brawl.
Farcical really.
|
|
|
|
Post by st3v3 on Jan 14, 2020 14:00:45 GMT
Seems just a touch harsh that. And by harsh I mean completely ridiculous. Guys naturally gravitate to a situation like that to break it up. Even if they didnt it wasnt like it was a mass brawl. Farcical really. Yeah was handbags at best. Daft thing is if there was advertising boards between court and benches this won't of happened. Kuyinu is very unlucky as from memory he was holding Hawthorne back, but was just the typical bloke reaction like you say - making his presence known for his team mate. But then again its a well known rule and they will know it. I dont know if a small fine for players would be better option? |
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 14, 2020 15:22:50 GMT
Seems just a touch harsh that. And by harsh I mean completely ridiculous. Guys naturally gravitate to a situation like that to break it up. Even if they didnt it wasnt like it was a mass brawl. Farcical really. Exactly - I could understand it if there was brawl with punches being thrown but this was far from that... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2020 15:50:28 GMT
Had the same thing happen to me once, I left the bench to break up a fight (may have thrown a punch) got a 1 match ban for leaving the bench not for fighting. Thought it was odd but it is quite clear in the rule book all players are given. Harsh rule imo especially if they're stopping things from escalating. Surrey will still win i suspect
|
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 14, 2020 15:59:29 GMT
Had the same thing happen to me once, I left the bench to break up a fight (may have thrown a punch) got a 1 match ban for leaving the bench not for fighting. Thought it was odd but it is quite clear in the rule book all players are given. Harsh rule imo especially if they're stopping things from escalating. Surrey will still win i suspect Thanks - I did wonder if it was a standard competition rule. Seems harsh - but if its a rule then its a rule I suspect the "backs against the wall" status suits Scorchers and so it won't do us much harm... |
|
|
|
Post by drummergirl95 on Jan 14, 2020 16:08:27 GMT
Seems just a touch harsh that. And by harsh I mean completely ridiculous. Guys naturally gravitate to a situation like that to break it up. Even if they didnt it wasnt like it was a mass brawl. Farcical really. Exactly and what punishment does Hussein get... |
|
|
|
Post by strandedona303 on Jan 14, 2020 16:27:46 GMT
Exactly and what punishment does Hussein get... One match ban! The rule is in place to stop benches clearing. |
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 14, 2020 16:30:17 GMT
|
|
DJ
Rookie
Posts: 24
|
Post by DJ on Jan 14, 2020 16:31:56 GMT
Seems just a touch harsh that. And by harsh I mean completely ridiculous. Guys naturally gravitate to a situation like that to break it up. Even if they didnt it wasnt like it was a mass brawl. Farcical really. Exactly and what punishment does Hussein get... At least they’ve acknowledged it was Husseins fault! 👍🏻 |
|
|
|
Post by notoriousbigz on Jan 14, 2020 16:43:02 GMT
I think "it" has been blown out of all proportions. "It" is nothing of any note. Should probably have just all moved on, but no no the BBL make a t*ts up of it as per.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2020 16:51:39 GMT
Strange because an ejection is not an automatic ban in EBL. |
|
|
|
Post by raiders92 on Jan 14, 2020 18:51:01 GMT
Interesting decision, which I would agree seems a bit excessive. What’s also interesting is that the suspension isn’t for their next game (against Lions) but the one after (against Raiders). Why’s that? Cause were **** and will still beat us!! |
|
|
|
Post by gloryeagle on Jan 14, 2020 21:00:47 GMT
Exactly and what punishment does Hussein get... At least they’ve acknowledged it was Husseins fault! 👍🏻 I'm genuinely worried about you. Where does it say it was Husseins fault? |
|
|
|
Post by raiderstid on Jan 14, 2020 21:29:30 GMT
I haven’t read the up at all but what did they do..... score in the last second of the game whilst already being up by 30??? MADNESS EVERYWHERE 👀
|
|
|
|
Post by notoriousbigz on Jan 14, 2020 22:16:19 GMT
^ Absolutely rattled the lad.
|
|
|
|
Post by gloryeagle on Jan 14, 2020 23:21:43 GMT
I wish Hussein had rattled someone to make this all worth it!!
|
|
|
|
Post by gloryeagle on Jan 14, 2020 23:24:37 GMT
I do actually quite like the rule that an ejection leads to a suspension though. Call it basketballs red cards, doesn't matter what you get one for in football you still serve a suspension.
|
|
|
|
Post by bagger on Jan 15, 2020 22:18:35 GMT
So the BIG question is will Raiders get their first win, with Scorchers missing 2 players?
|
|
|
|
Post by mitchmitchell21 on Jan 15, 2020 23:42:08 GMT
So the BIG question is will Raiders get their first win, with Scorchers missing 2 players? we could even be missing 3 depends how back cayrafs injury is |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2020 13:48:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 16, 2020 18:25:46 GMT
Not sure I follow your logic - you seem to be arguing that each case should be judged on its merits for most of the article but then conclude that BE's stance on an automatic suspension is correct. Am I missing something ? |
|
|
|
Post by sussexbantam on Jan 16, 2020 18:30:33 GMT
So the BIG question is will Raiders get their first win, with Scorchers missing 2 players? we could even be missing 3 depends how back cayrafs injury is It'll be like the old days again - Tayo, Skylar, Uno, Cook, Wilkins to start with Big Mike and Jeremy N-H off the bench - its a stretch to even call that a 6 man rotation. I wonder if Joel Freeland fancies a game ?!? |
|
