|
Post by LTFan on Jul 13, 2020 10:09:10 GMT
I’ve been catching up on a few podcasts over the last week or so and there’s been mentions of the BBL being very close to a TV deal for next season, but it’s not quite ‘over the line’ just yet. But those involved, including team owners, are confident that a deal will be done.
The alluded to deal is a weekly game on a free to air terrestrial channel. It’ll accompany existing BBL social media coverage (not sure if this includes games on YouTube) and coverage provided for betting purposes – which I assume will be a continuation of the Perform/Watch & Bet deal (for the likes of Bet365).
My educated guess would be a return of a weekly game on the BBC Red Button/BBC Sport website and app, or possibly a weekly game on ITV4. I’m not sure if there are any other likely possibilities…
Clearly there’s some rumblings… does anyone on here with better connections than me know anything they can share – or even hint at?
|
|
|
Post by faz on Jul 13, 2020 12:00:57 GMT
I’m not sure that it matters anymore. I’m not sure if viewing figures but is there anymore exposure on terrestrial than on you tube?
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 13, 2020 13:30:31 GMT
I’m not sure that it matters anymore. I’m not sure if viewing figures but is there anymore exposure on terrestrial than on you tube? Short answer - yes. It's all about exposure - getting your product seen by as many people as possible. YouTube coverage is great, last year games were averaging about 2,000 viewers - so on a weekend of 8 games that's 16,000 people watching the BBL that probably wouldn't have been otherwise. But most of those people would have actively sought out that coverage, already knowing it was available to them. What a weekly game on a free to air terrestrial channel would do is increase the number of people watching the BBL who didn't actively seek it out, who didn't even necessarily know it existed until they stumbled across it whilst channel surfing on a random Sunday afternoon. Take ITV4 for example - 8.6 million individuals watch it each week, 65% of which are men, and is the 5th most watched digital channel for men in the UK. That's a very good shop window for your product. Of course not all those people would stop and continue watching a BBL game should they stumble upon it, and not all those people would seek it out again at a later date. But if you can hook just a small percentage of those people into becoming at least semi-regular fans then you're on your way to significantly growing your sport.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2020 19:15:31 GMT
A TV deal only gets older fans to join, people who are 30 or older. There's huge amounts to be made from that demographic. Its that group that will likely have young children and they will want to get them involved in sports. Showing family friendly basketball appeals to the parents who don't like the anger thats often found in football.
People under 30 though, in the large part dont watch TV. They watch the likes of YouTube and other social media platforms. If you want to build from the ground up and play the long game you go for YouTube, if you want a quick fix and hope they stay when most will be set in their sporting ways yoh go for a tv deal.
Ultimately there's no wrong way, the idea that a TV deal makes a difference is mad, tv money really does but not just the tv deal. You want a good tv deal with an even better social media presence. We as a sport need to invest in all levels of sport, not just the playing aspect. Hire marketing people, hire social media people, hire people that are experts in their field, not just someone who did a degree 10 years ago while playing and havent touched it since
|
|
|
Post by interestedridersfan on Jul 14, 2020 5:16:27 GMT
I think how BBL matches are shown becomes vital in a situation where there are limits on crowd numbers allowed or potential for a lockdown to stop season ticket holders from attending a full season
Compensation at Nottingham Forest Football Club to season ticket holders not being able to see full season involves a FOC pass to watch all the remaining games (home and away) live on live streaming etc
Obviously that benefit relies on people having to normally pay to watch those games
I realise it might not work the same for BBL etc but I assume it's something that is being discussed
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 14, 2020 9:22:09 GMT
A TV deal only gets older fans to join, people who are 30 or older. There's huge amounts to be made from that demographic. Its that group that will likely have young children and they will want to get them involved in sports. Showing family friendly basketball appeals to the parents who don't like the anger thats often found in football. People under 30 though, in the large part dont watch TV. They watch the likes of YouTube and other social media platforms. If you want to build from the ground up and play the long game you go for YouTube, if you want a quick fix and hope they stay when most will be set in their sporting ways yoh go for a tv deal. Ultimately there's no wrong way, the idea that a TV deal makes a difference is mad, tv money really does but not just the tv deal. You want a good tv deal with an even better social media presence. We as a sport need to invest in all levels of sport, not just the playing aspect. Hire marketing people, hire social media people, hire people that are experts in their field, not just someone who did a degree 10 years ago while playing and havent touched it since I agree with you that two different approaches is needed, one for the older audience and one for the younger audience. A good social media presence is critical. Although I strongly disagree that a good TV deal makes no difference to the popularity of the league. What I don't really understand about the younger audience (and I am above 30, so what do I know) is their short attention span. Research shows they aren't interested in watching a full game. They only want 10 minute highlights. So by that logic the BBL would be better off scrapping the live YouTube coverage and replacing it with 10 minute highlights of each game. Which I think most of us on here would be very disappointed with, but I also suspect most of us on here are over 30.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 9:24:40 GMT
I wasn't clear, a prime time terrestrial tv deal would work but people don't chanel hop that far. Its tbe money from a tv deal which make the impact, being on dave on a Tuesday morning at 10am wouldn't make a difference
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 14, 2020 9:31:35 GMT
I think how BBL matches are shown becomes vital in a situation where there are limits on crowd numbers allowed or potential for a lockdown to stop season ticket holders from attending a full season Compensation at Nottingham Forest Football Club to season ticket holders not being able to see full season involves a FOC pass to watch all the remaining games (home and away) live on live streaming etc Obviously that benefit relies on people having to normally pay to watch those games I realise it might not work the same for BBL etc but I assume it's something that is being discussed Having seen how football (outside the Premier League) has dealt with fans not being able to attend games, this has crossed my mind recently too. How successful would a return of BBL TV (for those who don't remember, it was a paid subscription streaming service that offered one live game a week) be in these current circumstances? Obviously it would need to be expanded to provide coverage of all games, but how many people would be willing to pay a monthly/season fee to watch their team if they weren't allowed to actually attend? Perhaps it could offer 2 tiers - an all games pass and an all games of a single team pass (similar to how NBA League Pass works)? I absolutely accept this won't grow the popularity of the league at all (although perhaps the BBL could provide free highlights on YouTube). But could it provide enough revenue to enable the league the function behind close doors? Personally I suspect not. But it's certainly food for thought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 9:54:11 GMT
There was a recent podcast with the person in charge. It cost 120k to run BBLTV and only took 20k in funds. It was a no brainer why it was cancelled. I would pay though
|
|
erd87
Bench Player
Posts: 135
|
Post by erd87 on Jul 14, 2020 10:24:27 GMT
I think ultimately a TV deal would be a good thing for the BBL. It gives the league legitimacy and would be a good way to showcase what's good about the league. If we could get one live game every week/fortnight that shows what's good about the BBL, I think that would be a good step forward.
One of the problems with the league this year is not necessarily the product, which I believe most would say has been pretty good, it is more the way it has been documented. So for example I've seen loads of highlight plays at Eagles games this season from home and away teams, it doesn't look great when it has been captured by what is essentially jumped up CCTV cameras with grainy footage. Don't get me started on the stuff that has been missed because they can't keep up with play. I know it costs money to employ someone to stand under the basket with a camera, but surely it would be better spent to package the game properly rather than what we had last season? Especially when Eagles games had a better camera system in place before Keymotion was introduced and made games unwatchable for most.
Don't get me wrong I've enjoyed watching other BBL games on YouTube this season and it's certainly enhanced my enjoyment of going to Eagles games as it's helped increase my knowledge of what else is going on around the league. But us hard-core BBL fans are in pretty short supply when you look at the amount of views. But if we're looking to grow audiences maybe less is more, and we should be looking at quality and not soul much quantity?
After seeing what is possible with the GB game that was played up here, and the production values that were evident that day, it would be nice to at least aim for something close to that. Again, I know money is a huge issue.
|
|
|
Post by interestedridersfan on Jul 14, 2020 13:48:54 GMT
There was a recent podcast with the person in charge. It cost 120k to run BBLTV and only took 20k in funds. It was a no brainer why it was cancelled. I would pay though The figures change if it's a written back up for if season tickets can't be honoured Probably too complicated though
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 14, 2020 14:07:20 GMT
I wasn't clear, a prime time terrestrial tv deal would work but people don't chanel hop that far. Its tbe money from a tv deal which make the impact, being on dave on a Tuesday morning at 10am wouldn't make a difference I agree. But it doesn't need to be prime time on a major channel either. The BBL would be mad to turn down a weekly Sunday afternoon slot on ITV4 for example.
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 14, 2020 14:14:18 GMT
There was a recent podcast with the person in charge. It cost 120k to run BBLTV and only took 20k in funds. It was a no brainer why it was cancelled. I would pay though £120,000 to stream one weekly live game? Wow. I know it was only a few years ago but it could be done for a lot less now. And it would need to be, because a revamped BBL TV would need to offer coverage of all games, not just one. But I believe the Perform/Watch & Bet deal more than covers the expenses of providing the basic coverage that the BBL currently do, so the entire model would be different and might be worth revisiting. Question is, what's financially better for the league (forget growing the league right now, this is about survival plain and simple) - providing free coverage to everyone on YouTube or providing coverage to fans happy to pay £10 a month? I can see pros and cons for both.
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 14, 2020 14:18:43 GMT
One of the problems with the league this year is not necessarily the product, which I believe most would say has been pretty good, it is more the way it has been documented. So for example I've seen loads of highlight plays at Eagles games this season from home and away teams, it doesn't look great when it has been captured by what is essentially jumped up CCTV cameras with grainy footage. Don't get me started on the stuff that has been missed because they can't keep up with play. I know it costs money to employ someone to stand under the basket with a camera, but surely it would be better spent to package the game properly rather than what we had last season? Especially when Eagles games had a better camera system in place before Keymotion was introduced and made games unwatchable for most. Get used to Keemotion, it's a multi year deal. Although the BBL do keep promising it'll improve over time. I understand it provides coverage at a much lower cost, but in some venues it really does look poor (although in others it looks a lot better). But I did really enjoy the enhanced on-screen stats lasts season, they were excellent. I assume the two are linked, as Lions were the only ones not providing the new onscreen graphics and were also the only ones not using Keemotion.
|
|
|
Post by interestedridersfan on Jul 14, 2020 15:33:15 GMT
There was a recent podcast with the person in charge. It cost 120k to run BBLTV and only took 20k in funds. It was a no brainer why it was cancelled. I would pay though £120,000 to stream one weekly live game? Wow. I know it was only a few years ago but it could be done for a lot less now. And it would need to be, because a revamped BBL TV would need to offer coverage of all games, not just one. But I believe the Perform/Watch & Bet deal more than covers the expenses of providing the basic coverage that the BBL currently do, so the entire model would be different and might be worth revisiting. Question is, what's financially better for the league (forget growing the league right now, this is about survival plain and simple) - providing free coverage to everyone on YouTube or providing coverage to fans happy to pay £10 a month? I can see pros and cons for both. BBL TV was all of the games live (apart from at Manchester I think?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 18:33:07 GMT
Another reason a TV doesn't work is the teams
Scenario A you watch a game, you enjoy it and you want to go see a game live. You watched Leicester V Plymouth. You thought wow I want to be a Plymouth fan because I have taste. But you live anywhere north of Torbay you won't go a game. Nobody's travelling more than half hour for a game. So you decide to follow them on TV when they're on. You never get the feel for the club like we all have for ours. You watxh a few more games but the magics gone.
Scenario B you watxh a game and go christ this was amazing! I have to watch this live! You Google the bbl and after half an hour of confusion you end up on the British site instead of the German. No BBL club is near you, there's only 11 covering 4 countries so chances are there isn't going to be. You think you'll just Google the 2nd division. There isn't one, you realise there's an 11 team league and no team can get promoted or relegated like they do in football, you give up.
Scenario C you watxh a game and go christ this was amazing! I have to watch this live! You Google the bbl and after half an hour of confusion you end up on the British site instead of the German. No BBL club is near you, there's only 11 covering 4 countries so chances are there isn't going to be. Luckily you really like the Plymouth team and find their wiki page and you realise they used to play in the ebl, you follow that link and find 3 divisions of more teams, fantastic! Even better 1 is really close to you so you decide to book tickets, only the team can't tell you the venue as they play in 3 different ones. That's OK tho they're all nearby, can't see a place to buy tickets. Somehow you manage to find it all because you really want to watxh after that amazing game on TV, only the kits looks 5 years old, there's a 100 different court markings and there's only 20 people in the crowd. There wasn't a programme and you cant find out the other teams full name, you only know them from their name on the scoreboard 'Guest
No scenario brings in new fans, tv deals may get someone watching on TV but that's it. It would take an incredible amount of luck for that fan to then turn up to a game. Clubs need to do more to build their own brand, be the best night out, best sporting attraction in your city/Town. That's how you build
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 18:57:00 GMT
And while I'm in my rant mode, how many of the clubs are actively looking to help first tkme fans? Some of the besr things about British Basketball is how close of a relationship you can have with the players. Are you asking fans as they enter your arenas is this your first time, can I help you with anything? Do your commentators let all the fans know that you can meet the players after the game? Are your programme sellers just stood there tslking to regulars or are they circulating and seeking out people that look like they're lost and may need one. Are your mascots trying to get the crowd going every time they're on show or are they going through the motions. When was the last time you switched it up? Have you got instagram frames for the games so first time fans can have an easy photo opportunity that they will share and it wil have all of your social media info on? Are you taking out add space in local directed publications? Or are you doing the same thing you've been doing for the last 10 years. The world is a different world, 10 years ago may as well be 100
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 19:32:38 GMT
I watched a game and thought Christ this is amazing! We were 21 down but beat Towers. It was more than 30 minutes away but I went to watch them. You know the rest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 21:30:36 GMT
You literally talk about going to the final 4s before leopards in that article lol. Anyway mate, we all know you're an anomaly in this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 21:38:40 GMT
I'm like the bloke whp liked his razor so much he bought the company. Freak was word you're after.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2020 21:41:28 GMT
it cant be any worse than last seasons "sea sickness" games with that horrible automated camera that was thought to be a good idea.
|
|
|
Post by inaminute23 on Jul 16, 2020 8:42:59 GMT
BL being very close to a TV deal for next season I'm sure this is said every year, at this time
|
|
|
Post by interestedridersfan on Jul 16, 2020 8:52:36 GMT
The problem for BBL is that many of the fans aren't there because they love the sport of basketball
They are there for the family atmosphere and the whole experience of an evening or afternoon out together
They aren't avid basketball fans that need to watch their team every week and know the results etc
They won't go looking for games of basketball to watch on TV and certainly won't pay for the experience of watching on TV or livestream
The diehards who love their team and the sport in BBL are so small in number at each club they will probably still be able to attend games when restrictions are in place
IF and it's a big IF - they feel safe to do so.
Many of the diehards will be in the older category
Not sure how many of the non diehards will risk going indoors in a crowd when it doesn't mean a lot to them in the first place?
There's no worthwhile market place I can see for BBL on TV - certainly no money in it
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 16, 2020 11:46:21 GMT
Another reason a TV doesn't work is the teams Scenario A you watch a game, you enjoy it and you want to go see a game live. You watched Leicester V Plymouth. You thought wow I want to be a Plymouth fan because I have taste. But you live anywhere north of Torbay you won't go a game. Nobody's travelling more than half hour for a game. So you decide to follow them on TV when they're on. You never get the feel for the club like we all have for ours. You watxh a few more games but the magics gone. Scenario B you watxh a game and go christ this was amazing! I have to watch this live! You Google the bbl and after half an hour of confusion you end up on the British site instead of the German. No BBL club is near you, there's only 11 covering 4 countries so chances are there isn't going to be. You think you'll just Google the 2nd division. There isn't one, you realise there's an 11 team league and no team can get promoted or relegated like they do in football, you give up. Scenario C you watxh a game and go christ this was amazing! I have to watch this live! You Google the bbl and after half an hour of confusion you end up on the British site instead of the German. No BBL club is near you, there's only 11 covering 4 countries so chances are there isn't going to be. Luckily you really like the Plymouth team and find their wiki page and you realise they used to play in the ebl, you follow that link and find 3 divisions of more teams, fantastic! Even better 1 is really close to you so you decide to book tickets, only the team can't tell you the venue as they play in 3 different ones. That's OK tho they're all nearby, can't see a place to buy tickets. Somehow you manage to find it all because you really want to watxh after that amazing game on TV, only the kits looks 5 years old, there's a 100 different court markings and there's only 20 people in the crowd. There wasn't a programme and you cant find out the other teams full name, you only know them from their name on the scoreboard 'Guest No scenario brings in new fans, tv deals may get someone watching on TV but that's it. It would take an incredible amount of luck for that fan to then turn up to a game. Clubs need to do more to build their own brand, be the best night out, best sporting attraction in your city/Town. That's how you build You weren't kidding about being on a rant! Trying to look for the positives in your scenarios Scenario A - Even if people don't actually attend games, more eyeballs on the league and teams creates better brand awareness and better sponsorship opportunities. Scenario B - At least it might grow interest in basketball in this country, at whatever level. Which should ultimately improve the professional level. Scenario C - Again, an increase in people's interest in basketball at any level is a positive. You can't turn the BBL into the NBA overnight (or even in 100 years) with just one course of action. Ok, I'm being overly optimistic to match you being overly pessimistic. A TV deal alone won't save the BBL. But it would at least give it a nudge in the right direction.
|
|
|
Post by LTFan on Jul 16, 2020 11:49:27 GMT
£120,000 to stream one weekly live game? Wow. I know it was only a few years ago but it could be done for a lot less now. And it would need to be, because a revamped BBL TV would need to offer coverage of all games, not just one. But I believe the Perform/Watch & Bet deal more than covers the expenses of providing the basic coverage that the BBL currently do, so the entire model would be different and might be worth revisiting. Question is, what's financially better for the league (forget growing the league right now, this is about survival plain and simple) - providing free coverage to everyone on YouTube or providing coverage to fans happy to pay £10 a month? I can see pros and cons for both. BBL TV was all of the games live (apart from at Manchester I think?) No it wasn't. I think you're getting confused with the more recent LiveBasketball.TV effort. BBL TV broadcast one live game a week. I think that increased slightly in it's second year of operation, but it never even got to the dizzy heights of two games a week before it closed.
|
|